Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Seven Haven TradeSeven Haven Trade

Editor's Pick

Section 3 of the 14th Amendment

Jeffrey Miron

Constitution

Adopted in the wake of the Civil War, Section 3’s intent was to prevent Civil War leaders from serving in high federal office. That goal was understandable, but Section 3 has implications that might give pause.

Section 3 is anti‐​democratic. If voters want an insurrectionist, perhaps they should get an insurrectionist. (Democracy, per H.L. Mencken, is the theory that the people know what they want and should get it good and hard.) In some cases, insurrectionists have good reasons for their actions (think the Revolutionary War). Relatedly, Section 3 punishes the losers from internal conflicts, which might inhibit reconciliation.

And if Section 3 keeps a popular candidate off the ballot, that will likely increase polarization and resentment amongst the candidate’s supporters, perhaps to the point of further, and worse, insurrection.

An earlier version of this article appeared on Substack on January February 10, 2024.

You May Also Like

Editor's Pick

Chris Edwards School choice reforms are spreading across the nation. Governments in 33 states are now providing financial support for private schooling through 80...

Editor's Pick

Paul Matzko I had the opportunity to work with two economists on a paper testing a proposition from my book on conservative broadcasting in the 1960s. I had argued...

Editor's Pick

Alex Nowrasteh I’ve written a series of papers on illegal immigrant crime in Texas based on data from the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS). My research was featured...

Editor's Pick

Colin Grabow The George II is a case study in Jones Act dysfunction. Delivered in December 1980 by a now‐​defunct Louisiana shipyard, the forty‐​three‐​year‐​old containership—long in...